Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Rights case finds government abandoned special needs students

VICTORIA - It hardly seems revolutionary to declare that students with learning disabilities have the right to an education.
That’s the essence of a BC Human Rights Tribunal ruling that found the government discriminated against children with disabilities. When cash-strapped school districts needed to cut spending, they made kids like Jeffry Moore take the hit.
Moore’s family launched the human rights’ complaint after he was abandoned by the public school system. Jeffry is bright, but severely dyslexic. By the end of Grade 3 he still couldn’t read. The North Vancouver school district had referred him to its centre for special needs students for intensive help, but then closed it in 1994 to save about $290,000 a year.
Find a private school if you want your child to learn, the Moores were told.
So they did. Jeffrey’s father was a bus driver, and his mother a secretary. Private school bills were crushing. But they didn’t see a choice.
The Moores did see a chance to turn things around for other children, and launched their human rights complaint.
Their victory was complete. They get compensation for a decade of private school costs.
And the tribunal ordered the government to mend its ways. The education ministry has a year to ensure that funding for students with severe learning disabilities reflects the number of children who need help, and to set up a system to make sure that school districts are delivering the services.
It’s the kind of ruling - by a court or tribunal - that raises worries about non-elected people setting public policy. The theory is that politicians are elected to make those decisions. They should have the right to deny education to kids with disabilities, or aboriginal children, or whoever else they choose. the argument goes.
But a reading of the ruling shows the tribunal stayed within the laws the politicians created. The school act says “it is the goal of a democratic society to ensure that all of its members receive an education that enables them to become personally fulfilled and publicly useful, thereby increasing the strength and contributions to the health and stability of that society.”
And the Human Rights Code prevents discrimination. Denying a child an education because of a disability is against the law.
The government can still set education funding levels and spending priorities. School districts can justify a lack of services if providing them would cause extreme hardship, the tribunal noted.
But it’s illegal to deny services to people with disabilities as an easy way of saving money.
British Columbians should welcome the ruling on practical grounds.
Jeffry got the help he needed in a private school. He has just graduated from BCIT and is apprenticing as a plumber. He’s achieving what the school act promised - personal fulfillment and a chance to make society stronger.
Contrast that with the outlook if he had continued to struggle, without adequate help, in the public school system, and dropped out or simply graduated without basic literacy skills.
This isn’t a partisan issue. Jeffry’s case started way back when the Harcourt government was in power, and more than decade later students with special needs are still often the first to suffer when school districts face money troubles. In 2001 school districts had identified 47,000 with special needs. Then the Liberals ended targeted funding for those students. Now school districts say there are only 40,000 students with special needs. Either there has been a miraculous drop in students with learning problems, or thousands of children have been abandoned as a low spending priority.
Vince Ready’s fact-finding report on the teachers’ strike confirmed that support for special needs students is inadequate.
Education Minister Shirley Bond isn’t commenting on the tribunal decision. The government has 60 days to launch an appeal.
But the principle seems simple. The government promises children a chance at an education. It’s a commitment that’s worth keeping, for all students.
Footnote: The government faces more problems over the issue. A Vancouver law firm is planning a class-action lawsuit on behalf of dyslexic students and their families, arguing the failure to identify the disability and help students resulted in serious long-term damage to their lives.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This decision reflects the important role of the courts in defending minority rights.

Political realities mean that provincial politicians and local trustees will always put the interests of the majority over those of a minority, especially a more expensive one. (Do you cut one music teacher and piss off all the parents, or one special ed teacher and face just three of them?)

The Moore case happened under the NDP, way before the latest but heaviest round of school cuts in 2002-05. But the legal action slipped through just before the Liberals eliminated this avenue for recourse, along with the Children's Commissioner, in 2001-02. So those who suffered the same fate as Jeffrey in more recent years no longer had this opportunity to challenge the services they were denied.

Call me cynical, but it was too convenient that such avenues for legal appeal were taken away just as the Liberals were imposing hundreds of millions in unfunded new costs on our public schools, just as they were "streamlining" regulations to allow schools to cut special ed services as they pleased, and just as they were focussing accountability on reporting systems that disguise failure among students with special needs by allowing schools to "excuse" them from taking the standardised tests.

When you put these all together, it paints a very ugly picture of intent.

Anonymous said...

I'm not surprised that the North Vancouver School District advertises that special needs students have dropped..my son in grade 5 (reading level low grade 2) has been on the list to be tested for learning disabilities for the last three years...still waiting...North Van only likes to bring attention to their successess not to the poor children that require attention or learn differently than the norm.