Things are turning into a mess in B.C.
Recall, leadership squabbling, a lame duck premier who won’t go away, a referendum that might axe the HST – it’s a formula for political chaos.
And political chaos is a formula for government paralysis on issues that matter to British Columbians.
First, recall. The Fight HST forces announced their recall targets Monday. Universities Minister Ida Chong is first on the hit list.
She won her Oak Bay-Gordon Head riding by a skinny margin - 561 votes - in 2009. Lots of recall canvassers have signed up in her riding and nearby Saanich North. And Chong has not been effective in representing the riding on key local issues.
She is thus vulnerable, even given the tough threshold for a successful recall effort. Proponents will need to get signatures from 40 per cent of the people registered to vote in the last election - about 18,000 names. (Chong won with 11,877 votes.)
The recall campaign starts Monday. Proponents have 60 days to get enough signatures to oust the MLA and force a byelection.
The Fight HST crew plans campaigns against Terry Lake in Kamloop North and Don McRae in Comox starting in early January, with more efforts launched every month until the HST is gone or the Liberals bumped from power.
Chong’s recall has become the trial run for both sides.
Her first-day response made no mention of the HST. She said she had done a good job, the NDP was playing a big behind-the-scenes recall role (likely true) and the effort was an abuse of the recall legislation. Recall was supposed to be used against MLAs who acted unethically, Chong said.
That’s just untrue. The successful referendum on recall, which led to the legislation, asked if British Columbians should have the right to remove their MLA between elections. Voters would decide what constituted grounds for dismissal.
And the claim will be a tough sell, given the Liberals’ history. Gordon Campbell was calling for recall campaigns against New Democrat MLAs within months of losing the 1996 election. Kevin Falcon’s Total Recall targeted all 40 NDP MLAs in 1999; he said it had nothing to do with the individuals, but was attempt to oust the government. (The effort flopped, but created big headaches for the New Democrats.)
The justifiable claim that the NDP is playing a political role in the campaigns might deter some people from signing.
Campbell is a big problem for Chong. He has announced he’ll leave after a new leader is selected Feb. 26.
But that’s three months away, And he’s still insisting that he - and Chong - did everything right in bringing in the HST. The only failure was not explaining the decision more effectively after it was a done deal, he says.
In fact, Campbell is a big problem for the party. Lame duck leaders always are. When they are unpopular and don’t recognize that they’re lame, things get really messy.
Campbell says he’s still the premier and in charge of the budget and throne speech. Nothing will change until the new Liberal leader is selected.
For the Liberal party, that’s terrible. Campbell is leaving because the public thinks he’s doing a bad job and doesn’t trust him. Yet he’ll be the face of the party for another three months and defend the budget and throne speech.
Chong and the Liberal party would be helped if Campbell stepped down as premier now. MLAs could select someone - ideally not running for the leadership - to be premier until the leadership was decided. Campbell could cart away some baggage and avoid some unpleasant months.
And the interim premier could announce the HST referendum would be held in February, before a new leader was selected. An earlier departure by Campbell might help the party and calm things down a bit.
But the months ahead - and perhaps until the next election - are going to bring uncertainty that slows investment and progress in B.C.
Footnote: The New Democrats are adding to the uncertainty as some party members continue to take aim at the leadership of Carole James. The issues are likely to be addressed at an NDP provincial council meeting this weekend.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Ida helped make Gordon's bed...she can now lie in it: double entendre and all.
"Gordon Campbell was calling for recall campaigns against New Democrat MLAs within months of losing the 1996 election. Kevin Falcon’s Total Recall targeted all 40 NDP MLAs in 1999; he said it had nothing to do with the individuals, but was attempt to oust the government."
Thanks for pointing this out, Paul. BC Liberal supporters in the media seem to conveniently forget that fact.
Ida leaving will be no great loss. she has been getting a free ride for a long time. We have seen more of her lately than in previous years.
Gordon Campbell should step down for the good of the BC Liberal party, but he won't quit as an MLA until after May 2011 when his overly rich pension vests.
I'd like to see Carole Taylor take up the mantel of interim leader/Premier until Feb. 26.
New Premier from the BC Liberals will be Patrick Kinsella
Anon 3:15:
I don't believe the pension is any sort of factor. The benefits wouldn't change if he stepped down as premier a few months earlier or later.
Cheers
Paul
Paul, can you explain why you assume the NDP is behind the campaign? I have been involved, in my experience, participation has been non partisan. I am not affiliated with any party, by the way.
Whining that the NDP is playing a behind-the-scenes role in recall has little power. If opposition parties were prohibited from involvement, recall would be impossible, not merely difficult. As Paul says, voters chose to have a right of recall between elections. The defense against recall is not to prevent supporters of other parties from participation, it is for the MLA be a great representative of their own constituents. Ida Chong, like other Liberals, places loyalty to Premier Campbell above all else.
Recall is proceeding as it was designed. It may be tough on the government but bad government is tough on the province.
Kim's question is a fair one paul. Clearly you are inferring, but will you "come out" and actually accuse the NDP Party of any illegal activity with respect to the referendum? Inuendo is one thing, but you allude you have more than that. As grama' said "show me the beef".
Raymond Graham
I said "referendum" but meant to say "recalls".
Raymond Graham
Raymond, Paul's words seem careful and precise, unlike those of another journalist.
Have a look at the difference:
http://northerninsights.blogspot.com/2010/11/it-is-what-it-is.html
Kim and Raymond:
Leaked notes on Moe Sihota's comments to a NDP executive meeting certainly suggest party involvement. They've been widely reported, but Vaughn Palmer did an update here.
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/will+ensure+that+recall+partisan+effort+below+surface/3840703/story.html
Norm, I understand that Moe Sihota made it clear he and the NDP understand the difference between the party being involved and its individual members being involved. Paul's column above infers otherwise, so I'm wondering what new information Paul has
that would clarify. If it's the same old, same old, then it would be a cheap shot. If it's something new...what is it?
Post a Comment