Vancouver council's decision to reject a mega-casino - and the provincial government's muted reaction - might be symbols of change.
The casino project was backed by Gordon Campbell and promoted by Liberal insiders who stood to profit. It was cited as justification for the $563-million new roof for B.C. Place.
But many Vancouver residents were opposed to another 1,500 slots. The health authority thought it would increase addiction and care costs.
And a lot of business owners weren't keen. A B.C. Lotteries study projected that gamblers from the Lower Mainland would lose $580,000 a day in the casino. That's money that wouldn't be spent in bars or movie theatres (or, for some addicts, on food for the family).
Vancouver council voted unanimously against the casino.
If Campbell were still the boss, Vancouver's politicians would have paid a price for defying the government.
Instead, a quick provincial government news release quoted Jobs Minister Pat Bell saying the government "respects the province and Vancouver city council's decision."
And the release put some distance between the current government and Campbell.
"We have a renewed government under the leadership of Premier Christy Clark, and we are going to take a fresh look at options to develop this property," Bell said (he didn't really say it, of course - no one talks like that).
It's a big reversal. In March 2010, Campbell and cabinet ministers Rich Coleman and Kevin Krueger announced the project as a done deal. It would bring economic activity, Campbell said, standing beside the managers from Paragon, the casino's prospective operator.
But the deal quickly raised questions.
Start with the B.C. Place roof project launched in 2008.
PavCo, the Crown corporation that oversaw the $500-million cost overrun on the Vancouver convention centre, put out a request for proposals for a contractor to put a new roof on the stadium on Nov. 3, 2008.
It gave companies two weeks to bid on a project that would end up costing more than $500 million.
That was ludicrous. Companies couldn't possibly prepare competent, competitive bids.
On Nov. 26, nine days after bidding closed, PavCo signed an agreement with PCL Constructors Canada Inc. It took 17 working days to go from the first call for bids to a commitment.
PCL was also the convention centre builder for PavCo. Its regional manager was a big Liberal donor.
PavCo's plan to pay for the roof relied mainly on leasing public land around the stadium for the development.
That money could have been used for needed services or facilities around the province, or to pay down debt. But the government wanted that new stadium roof.
So on March 6, 2009, PavCo put a formal request for "expressions of interest" and gave potential developers just three weeks to respond.
Three weeks to come up with a plan for a big, prime piece of real estate in a desirable city.
PavCo picked qualified contenders and on April 20 called for proposals, giving companies five weeks to put in bids. Again, not much time for a considered approach, or to line up funding.
Only two bids were submitted.
And Paragon's casino plan won.
Paragon had tight ties to the Campbell government. Insider T. Richard Turner is a party donor - he gave the Liberals $50,000 last year - and was appointed chairman of the B.C. Lottery Corp. and ICBC by the Liberals.
Turner was well-enough connected that when the government started getting spooked about the huge cost of a new stadium roof, he called then-tourism minister Kevin Krueger and told him the roof was a "deal-breaker." Build it, or the casino deal wouldn't go ahead.
So the government went ahead with the roof, at a cost of $125 for every person in the province.
Paragon and B.C. Lotteries might be back with a revised plan.
But right now, Vancouver seems to have made a good choice.
And the new Liberal government seems to have accepted it.
Footnote: Who knows, the Clark government may even abandon the plan to work each year to increase both the number of people who gamble in the province and the amount each one loses. Clark did run for office in 2001 on a promise to halt gambling expansion, a promise that was quickly shredded as the Liberals went on a gambling spree.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
Paul--
Stepping back for a second....
As you likely know, I wrote thousands of words on the subject of the various connections between the proponents, the facilitators, and the government of Mr. Campbell back when the deal was going down.
And much of that followed-up on the excellent original digging of Sean Holman some of which was later used, unattributed, by a number of proMedia reporters.
But here's the thing....
This is the first time I've seen it all in one place, written with both context and nuance such that it can be understood by all, even by someone reading about it for the first time.
So....
Kudos.
.
What does it all say about who owns this province? Certainly not the hard working families and citizens. It proves once again, the time has come for a major house cleaning at the Provincial Legislature - and that means all the Campbellites, including Christy Clark and her cast of Big Business toadies, cronies, and lickspittles need to go stand in a corner for the next decade or so.
Raymond Graham
Thank you Paul for a very clear explanation of the sequence of events regarding this issue. However, given that Liberal party and their insiders are involved in the "project" I can't see them or it going away any time soon, there is much more money to be made on their investments, ooops, I meant donations to the Liberal party, before the next provincial election. Look for it to rear it's head again after Christy is elected by those fine folks in Point Grey.
Whose wrath will Christy risk, city hall or Campbell and his wealthy crony Liberals? Christy can override the Casino decision. This would be what Campbell would do, and then lie to be re-elected, which he did twice, for two different elections.
I doubt Christy will keep her 2001 promise. Campbell's two election lies, meant nothing to Campbell. Nor,will Christy's promises, she is no different than Campbell. Christy is ignoring Campbell's criminal sale of the BCR, for very good reason. Campbell will fight tooth and nail, to get the casino. Never would he pass up a buck, corrupt money or not, he wouldn't care. Christy will do as Campbell tells her.
Post a Comment